A

AIA CES Credits

AV Office

Abstract Publication

Academic Affairs

Academic Calendar, Columbia University

Academic Calendar, GSAPP

Admissions Office

Advanced Standing Waiver Form

Alumni Board

Alumni Office

Architecture Studio Lottery

Assistantships

Avery Library

Avery Review

Avery Shorts

S

STEM Designation

Satisfactory Academic Progress

Scholarships

Skill Trails

Student Affairs

Student Awards

Student Conduct

Student Council (All Programs)

Student Financial Services

Student Health Services at Columbia

Student Organization Handbook

Student Organizations

Student Services Center

Student Services Online (SSOL)

Student Work Online

Studio Culture Policy

Studio Procedures

Summer Workshops

Support GSAPP

Close
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice Group 6

New Editorial Manifestos

Fri, Feb 12, 2016    1pm

Anthony Acciavatti, Manifest
Shumi Bose & Jack Self, The Real Review
Alfie Koetter, Project
Jimenez Lai, Treatise
Lily Wong, :
Organized by James Graham, The Avery Review

From journals to pamphlets, broadsheets to tearsheets, architectural publications of the past few years have been sites of innovation in both editorial style and content. Through their polyvocality and mutable forms, these not-always-so-little magazines have broadened architectural discourse, pushing designers to become writers, writers to engage design, and editors to operate within and without traditional institutional frameworks. In each of their particular approaches they remind us, again, of the political import of print and its inextricability from architectural thought.

This event is organized as part of the Graphics Project.

Architecture In Print: New Editorial Manifestos

From journals to pamphlets, broadsheets to tearsheets, architectural publications of the past few years have been sites of innovation in both editorial style and content. Through their polyvocality and mutable forms, these not-always-so-little magazines have broadened architectural discourse, pushing designers to become writers, writers to engage design, and editors to operate within and without traditional institutional frameworks. In each of their particular approaches they remind us, again, of the political import of print and its inextricability from architectural thought.