This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice
A distinction between animate and inanimate matter pervades so-called Western
thought since at least Aristostle’s De Anima. In this course, we questioned this persistent
dividing line and uncover new linkages between the quick and the dead, using metabolic
processes as both metaphor and mechanism for the transformation of matter.
Our methods borrowed from and work through scientific discourses, industry-specific
expertise, animal studies, indigenous knowledge, queer theory and critical race thory.
Having a history of working with organic materials I decided to explore a more industrialized
and large-scale material. Due to its increase in popularity, it has caused
mass timber to become synonymous with carbon neutrality, due to the stored carbon
offsetting the emissions expended by them. While this is at an industrial scale, I started
looking at my personal connections to mass timber and the waste produced by me
as an architect.
I keep a scrap box filled with a variety of wood pieces, ranging from large to small and
odd-shaped. These are leftovers that might otherwise be discarded. This setup enables
me to consistently utilize these materials instead of purchasing new wood sheets for
smaller projects.
This concept of a Scrap Box allowed me to look at different scales of scrap, comparing
my box to the making shops’ scraps and then to the scraps left behind after cutting the
smaller scraps.