A

AIA CES Credits
AV Office
Abstract Publication
Academic Affairs
Academic Calendar, Columbia University
Academic Calendar, GSAPP
Admissions Office
Advanced Standing Waiver Form
Alumni Board
Alumni Office
Anti-Racism Curriculum Development Award
Architecture Studio Lottery
Assistantships
Avery Library
Avery Review
Avery Shorts

S

STEM Designation
Satisfactory Academic Progress
Scholarships
Skill Trails
Student Affairs
Student Awards
Student Conduct
Student Council (All Programs)
Student Financial Services
Student Health Services at Columbia
Student Organization Handbook
Student Organizations
Student Services Center
Student Services Online (SSOL)
Student Work Online
Studio Culture Policy
Studio Procedures
Summer Workshops
Support GSAPP
Close
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice Group 6
ARCH_DERRINGTON_KUMPUSCH_Cara DePippo Graham_SP22-2.JPG

Fragmented Inversions

Through model making and quantitative analysis in excel, this project explores the relationship between fragmented users and uses in creating immersive spaces informed and supported by financial decisions. In doing so, the project interrogates the traditional development structures and existing spatial qualities of PS 64 and the East Village. The project first makes explicit the inversion of social and financial value and how they are represented in the built environment. Socially valuable spaces do not generate enough income to justify their construction without being accompanied by spaces that generate more financial value, such as market-rate housing and condominiums. However, the project would not gain necessary public support unless it includes socially but not financially valuable spaces, such as affordable housing and community programming. Ultimately these fragmented uses and user groups all integrate into the community by calling the building their home.

In the physical model, spaces with high community use and social value expand to represent the intersection of user groups and the interaction of the building and its neighborhood. In contrast, the residential floors are pressed together. Despite the model’s conceptual form, the project is fully rooted in financial metrics and is fully feasible.